This is a continuation of yesterday’s post, which showed the first part of this chatlog. To bring you up to speed – this is from December 17th, 2010 (December 18th GMT) – a few weeks after Amanda Todd first registered on BlogTV as ‘cutiielover’, and six days before the police turned up on their dawn raid on Amanda’s home. Amanda is communicating by speaking with her viewers, so I have to guess what is being said. However, the chatlog doesn’t need too much interpretation. I will be more hasty today, and try to provide two excerpts before wrapping it up tomorrow. Thank you for your patience.
The first comment says ‘out of focus’, implying that Amanda might be trying to expose herself. This opinion is enforced by the next comment:
‘can we see spome more of your cut eunderwear’ (of course, cute, not cut, as the write correct himself two lines down).
Someone says she needs 150 to fill the room. There is an explanation of this in a comment on yesterday’s post. What is relevant here is that we can tell that at this point Amanda has 139 viewers. That does not tie in with her story of being cajoled by a lone predator.
The next part of the chatlog is difficult to decipher. I have thought about it, and I think it would be unfair of me just to guess.
Someone says: ‘then you wiil get a waiting room for sure’. I believe that this would be in a response to something said by Amanda that would hint that she will do something at a certain point. I have received and read feedback from various sources that Amanda would often wait until she had a certain amount of viewers before she would display herself. That’s a harsh truth.
The chatlog excerpt finishes with a reference to what has been seen as possibly an even more notorious channel controlled by Amanda: her ‘isabella100555’ YouTube channel. Here, she used to put videos of herself singing and playing guitar but, unfortunately, she also produced videos of her and her friends up to no good. It is also thought that she was confident enough to show videos of herself and her friends smoking marijuana. The channel was later taken down.
So now we are on to the second part of today’s chatlog.
This chatlog takes a different turn. There is a warning that there is a ‘mod’ (moderator) in the room. Basically, that could mean, if the mod was decent, that the room was being watched and Amanda would run the risk of getting banned. However, not all mods were good, and I am highly suspicious that some of them might have been Cappers, and possibly fed through to cameracaptures and other sites.
I have no idea what ‘FLAGGED 4 PILLOW’ means.
The conversation is getting far more risky. Really, all of this just blows my mind. I find it difficult to describe? Feral? Primeval? Amoral? Immoral?
‘we should check your hot ass’ – hardly the way that Amanda describes her enticement by a predator in her video. It’s not exactly having funtime talk with friends. Amanda was fully aware of the fervour surrounding her every move. To be honest, she’s playing this room like a pro. However much I would like to make excuses, or to explain, Amanda knew what she was doing. Later on in the chat, she is warned NOT to go ahead, but she does so. And months later, when she was warned that if she didn’t stop someone would tell the police AGAIN, she still didn’t stop. After receiving her ban – maybe 10-15 minutes after this chat – she made the effort to return as ‘Announcing Amanda’. Internet addiction.
Someone asks if she is going to show again when he/she gets on. A stab in the dark – perhaps Amanda was waiting for a regular ‘friend’.
There are 151 viewers. The MOD warning goes up again.
This room is going downhill fast. Amanda is asked to pull down her pjs, just not to show any bush. That would mean instant ban.
‘she is shaved’ – Good grief! This room is now a cesspit. Amanda is now engaged in a discussion about whether she is shaved or not. Car*** refers to unshaven as ‘carpet’.
Amanda seems to be putting up some resistance to flashing any more than her breasts, but she is urged on by the crowd.
(Note: I am confused about when Amanda really did things online. It is possible that Amanda had already showed more online before – masturbating and flashing on TinyChat. However, I had assumed that those videos came much later – in 2011. But the police dawn raid on December 23rd would not have been over one photo, and I guess that simple flashing would not have provoked such a response.)
The rest of what is said is obvious. We are left with the opinion that two mods are now in the room. I will return to the final excerpt from this chatlog tomorrow. We’ve seen enough for today.