Is Carol Todd’s story finally unravelling?
This post was removed from the site after the blogger expressed reservations about her ability to accurately recall the events described therein.
My post from a couple of days ago – ‘It’s a disgrace’ – was about her article, which was edited and then disappeared altogether.
It has now been picked up here:
The original post by Carol is now being called ‘controversial’.
Is this the beginning of the end? Has Carol Todd finally just pushed things too far?
Over the next few days, it will be interesting to see what happens. Will Carol Todd try to explain? Will there be a new post desperately trying to avoid mentioning her collusion with the Vancouver Sun? Maybe she’ll retire from blogging.
Will anything come of this? Who knows. However, at least people will know what source is most trustworthy – Philip Rose.
‘Blogs sometimes raise important ethical questions about journalists and media outlets. More transparency here seems an obvious antiseptic to the festering concerns about how the Sun handled the Todd stories and handled fellow media.’
‘Carol Todd’s description of what happened kicked off a debate about journalism ethics.’
The latest lies:
Oh well! Don’t say I never told you!