A long, long post today. Get yourself a cup of tea before you start.
Throughout the writing of this blog, I have been astounded by the absolute stupidity of most of the people involved.
Watching all of this has two different effects. On one hand, it can provide a certain amount of amusement when bored but, to be honest, it more often results in waves of frustration mixed with depression. Can people really be that unintelligent? Anyways – let’s get on with the latest lunacy.
Back in May 2014 I realised that Glen Canning was up to mischief. I always give people the benefit of the doubt, but there are limits. Losing his daughter is a catastrophe and when that sort of thing happens, one can make plenty of excuses. If he had rushed out and killed those he thought responsible in a moment of madness, most people would have had a degree of sympathy.
However, Glen Canning got carried away. When people like Glen encounter a tragedy, something short-circuits their brain. Because the spotlight is on them and they are given attention, they begin to believe that they have, almost overnight, been gifted with huge insights into how the world works, or that they, in some way, have become experts on child care, teen behaviour, the Law – you name it, they know it. But Canning was a brainless fool, made genius by his daughter’s death.
When fame comes knocking on the door of people like Canning, they are too egotistical to turn it away. They are too self-centred to face the fact that an invitation to talk to government officials is simply a populist move to make lawmakers look as if they are listening to the people – they believe that they are consulted because they are important and of value. The only thing that got Canning in front of anyone was because his daughter strung herself up. Before that, no one would have asked him how to tie a shoe lace.
The useless Canning – up to his daughter’s death, a nonentity – then makes the next big mistake. He turns tragedy into career. There is money in parental failure – big money. He becomes the professional victim. Let’s be honest – it’s not about Rehtaeh, it’s all about Glen. Make no mistake – however much the likes of Canning and Todd would swear that it’s all about their daughters, it’s not. It’s not about protecting Rehtaeh, or re-telling her story, or even keeping her memory in a good way – it’s about being seen as the great Father Figure wreaking righteous vengeance on the foul perpetrators of evil or, to put it another way, the great Father Failure extirpating his guilt.
And now he’s blown it completely – aided by an equally cretinous opponent called Meghan Murphy (a clickbait-searching overblown idiot, founder of ‘Feminist Current’, who uses her vagina like a ventriloquist uses his dummy, spouting vapid claptrap).
So what’s occurring?
Way back in May 2014, I decided to have a go at Canning – not just for his criminal activity, but also for his hysterically hypocritical photograph collection. It actually turned in to a lot of fun, with Canning posting comments under multiple identities, resorting to filthy language, telling people I was some guy in Penzance, and eventually outing me as the pedophile who stalked Amanda Todd and caused her death.
I thought it was a one-week wonder. I usually take great glee in mischief-making but, after a few days, I usually end up ashamed of myself. Not because I have been naughty and provocative, but because I’ve got involved with such crass people. Their shoddiness infects me.
Anyways. Fast forward a few months.
Canning, reverting to his vicious vigilante persona, decides that he will, like the avenging hero he wants to be, sort out a woman’s problem by tweeting a picture of some guy nude (the guy’s penis tastefully blocked out by a coy rectangle). It gets a certain amount of Press coverage, basically wondering if Canning has, in effect, broken the law against publication of intimate and private images. But to be honest, Canning isn’t newsworthy material any more, and it all blows over.
But then, Frank Magazine picks up on the picture of the young girls that I had published months before.
However, this article is almost ignored. Nobody really cares any more. The Canning/Parsons story is out of everyone’s field of reference. Except for one person – the preposterously permanently premenstrual Meghan Murphy. Words fail me as to how dreadfully dumb she is.
The dumbass publishes this article on her website:
The comments contain:
I think it’s hilarious that Meghan Murphy publishes an article about Rehtaeh Parsons then hasn’t a clue who Glen Canning is – ‘Who is that?’ – and, like so many of these brain-injured types, can’t even be bothered to use Google to work out who it is.
Anyways. The retarded Murphy decides that the pictures are worth making a hullabaloo over. And so begins yet more tedious tawdriness, with Canning being painted as the Devil incarnate.
The horrendous harridan runs to her keypad and constructs this fresh article:
Had it not referred to me as the ‘troll’ I would have probably ignored it.
Murphy sets herself up as Moral Meghan, Guardian of the Internet. In doing so, she also sets herself up for a battle – when two self-righteous egomaniacs meet (her and Canning) it will only end in tears. Especially if I’m stirring things up in the background.
The comments on the article are hilarious.
‘I do not know if he is actually involved in the BDSM community, but I have heard that is very hard to escape from. Those within it will tell that you are likely to commit acts of violence, suffer horribly or even commit suicide if you have BDSM-related desires and do not fulfil them. It all seems very cult like to me.’
‘Rehtaeh Parson’s certainly spent the last two years of her short life in terrible mental torment, but what about before the rape? What sort of emotional poison is it for a female child whose father obviously sees her (or at least girls exactly like her) as disposable jack-off implements – to the degree that he actually creates more of this hate literature and puts it out into the world?
Did Rehtaeh Parsons ever enjoy a moment of peace and a feeling of safety? It’s quite possible that she did not.’
‘Glen Canning like majority of males believes he is entitled to sexually prey on/sexually exploit women and girls but when other males sexually prey and/or allegedly subject his daughter to male sexual violence then that is a violation of his female property!’
Even more hilariously, these comments appeared on Facebook:
‘I would call it “soft core” child pornography. Hard core child pornography would be far more “low grade”.The fact that he clearly used under age females is indeed disturbing. The “parents were present” quote, suggests that he only cares about following the law, not about doing the right thing. I can’t stand those kinds of people. They are such sheep.’
And so Glen gets involved using the trump card of…….Philip Rose.