Raven Kaliana

Well, there’s been quite a long gap in this blog, with only a few posts being made in the last few weeks.

My thoughts about this blog are many. Regular readers will know that, at one point, I closed it down. This was due to an inner moral conflict – how can I try to explain the Amanda Todd story in a way that avoids dragging the poor child’s life history into the gutter? However, I noticed immediately that the disgusting Todd supporters took advantage of the closure, counting it as some sort of victory. And, whilst I was personally sick and tired of this tawdry tale, Carol Todd continued unabashed, ignoring the fact that her daughter’s name still attracts ridicule and vitriol on all the sites that still allow commenting.

I seem to find myself in a very odd situation, in that I appear to be the only person still concerned about getting to the truth behind this story – or, perhaps more accurately, the only person left who can be bothered any more.

People may be asking themselves why I continue. Indeed, I ask myself that every day. There are quite a few reasons, and over the next few days I will be trying to explain why I think the whole treatment of the Amanda Todd story is morally reprehensible, and I will also be giving a great deal of explanations about why I think that the entire story has been fabricated. I felt the need to try and wrap up this blog once and for all, and to provide, finally, a full and conclusive end to it. I think that I have reached that point now. As a sort of tongue-in-cheek challenge, if, after the next fortnight or so, anyone still believes that they haven’t been completely conned by this story, then they are indeed beyond help.

Meanwhile…..regular readers will know of my adoration of Malala Yousafzai and of the blog’s dedication to Chelsea Manning. Now, they have both been nominated for Nobel prizes.

So in the same spirit of featuring people who deserve praise and admiration, today I introduce Raven Kaliana. Google will provide more information should anyone wish to find out more about her.

And so I leave you with something to think about. Raven Kaliana’s history is, as seems to be so common, one of appalling parenting. In crimes concerning children, the vast majority involve parents, family and close friends. Perhaps we should pause to think about Carol and Norm Todd’s real role in this fiasco. And yes, I am finger-pointing. And no, Philip Rose is never wrong.

Take care everyone. And don’t forget – tomorrow belongs to me.

Another one for DeeJay Bewy to go mad over

As usual, the insane DeeJay Bewy has managed to pick up on my posts and ensure that my message is spread as widely as possible. Thanks for that, DeeJay. So just to keep her occupied over the weekend, perhaps she will be interested in my little addition in helping the police to come to a satisfactory conclusion regarding the Amanda Todd story.

coquitlam_media@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Coquitlam_CPS@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
PoCo_CPS@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
west coast <bcrcmp@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
rob.vermeulen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
peter.thiessen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
darren.lagan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

With regards to your seemingly unending Amanda Todd case, I would like, yet again, to extend some help.

Perhaps you would like to contact two people – Ms Shylah Watson and Ms Bianca Maria Nitoi.  I am sure that they will be only too willing to confirm that there was no coercion nor trickery involved in the episodes of flashing.

In case you do not wish to contact them directly, then I would suggest that you contact Bianca Nitoi’s mother, Lore Nitoi, who is easily traceable, or indeed, you could go straight to the person who knows most – Mrs Carol Todd – and ask her.

If, for some reason, you are incapable of finding these people, I will be happy to supply all the contact information you require.

Thanks once again for your attention. I look forward to hearing from you.

P.S. Is there a reward for doing all your work for you? If so, I will get back to you with a list of charities it should go to. Thank you.

Yesterday’s post:

Again, I have contacted Amanda’s local police force. And again, they will do nothing to protect innocent citizens.

It would appear that you are ignoring my communications.

It is obvious that there never was a stalker who sent round one photo.

To help you with your detective work, I attach the following link:
https://philipjrose.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/the-story-takes-yet-another-bizarre-twist/

Here, you will see that on December 5th, Amanda knew that all her friends found the pictures. On the 17th December, she was banned from BlogTV. I have captured the very instant that occurred. You went round on December 23rd.

And no – the chatlog is not faked, it’s not been photo-shopped, it’s real. And just in case you don’t know, Amanda Todd was cutiielover.

So it’s time you and others told the truth. That’s the least we can expect from a police force. All you need to do is to reiterate that Kody Maxson is innocent, and that there was no stalker involved. Is that too much to ask? Should you still doubt the veracity of my claims, I have a lot more evidence, but surely you are aware of that.

I expect no reply, but I will conclude by telling you that this email, like the others, has been published. Should you be thinking of taking any further steps to silence me, I can tell you that I welcome every opportunity to put forward my case.

Thanks once again for your attention.

Specially for DeeJay Bewy

Again, I have contacted Amanda’s local police force. And again, they will do nothing to protect innocent citizens.

coquitlam_media@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Coquitlam_CPS@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
PoCo_CPS@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
west coast <bcrcmp@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
rob.vermeulen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
peter.thiessen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
darren.lagan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

It would appear that you are ignoring my communications.

It is obvious that there never was a stalker who sent round one photo.

To help you with your detective work, I attach the following link:
https://philipjrose.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/the-story-takes-yet-another-bizarre-twist/

Here, you will see that on December 5th, Amanda knew that all her friends found the pictures. On the 17th December, she was banned from BlogTV. I have captured the very instant that occurred. You went round on December 23rd.

And no – the chatlog is not faked, it’s not been photo-shopped, it’s real. And just in case you don’t know, Amanda Todd was cutiielover.

So it’s time you and others told the truth. That’s the least we can expect from a police force. All you need to do is to reiterate that Kody Maxson is innocent, and that there was no stalker involved. Is that too much to ask? Should you still doubt the veracity of my claims, I have a lot more evidence, but surely you are aware of that.

I expect no reply, but I will conclude by telling you that this email, like the others, has been published. Should you be thinking of taking any further steps to silence me, I can tell you that I welcome every opportunity to put forward my case.

Thanks once again for your attention.

Where’s my head at?

I’m not in full blogging mode today. The weather in the UK has been grim, but now Spring/Summer is arriving the outdoors is a much better place to be. Blogging is a Winter activity, I think.

Nothing is happening much on the Amanda Todd story. I’ve said this a load of times before, but it definitely is dying out. And maybe that’s a good thing. Her mother should realise that her memory is becoming more tarnished each day, but I think she doesn’t believe that. It’s a terrible shame that more people know now about what she got up to than ever before.

Here is where we are at. We now know with certainty that she was naked online many times, flashing and much worse. But loads of people knew that right from the beginning. We know that the myth of it all starting when she was 12 and in 7th grade is just a fallacy – interpreted that way by the public and the media to make it sound even more scandalous.

We know that she was late 13, early 14 when she really got active on BlogTV. We have her join date as ‘cutiielover’ as being in November 2010. We know that, by December 5th, very soon afterwards, her photo had been spread.

And we know, without shadow of a doubt, that the photos were spread by her friends. There was no stalker, no predator, no pedophile, no older man. Sure, these types exist in these circles, and they may have seen Amanda’s videos. But the stalker myth was created by her as an excuse for her behaviour. Here’s a much truer – perhaps 100% true – version of what happened. And remember, this is backed up by FACTS!

Amanda went online from 2008 onwards. We know that from her activities as mandy_kinz.

In late 2010, she joined BlogTV – around about September/October 2010. Unfortunately, she got into the habit of flashing. She was, at least once, accompanied by a friend.

On December 5th, 2010, we know that her pictures were in the public eye. She told people that her friends had found them.

So this is what happened: she joined BlogTV in November 2010, and soon found out that flashing brought her popularity. She just loved the attention. So she continued. There are hints about just how far she went, and pictures that show her doing a lot worse than just a quick flash.

At some point, either her friend or Amanda boast about what they get up to. Word gets out, and the kids in her school find the evidence. The links are sent around, and pretty quickly half of Vancouver are aware. By December 5th, she knows this.

But this doesn’t put her off. After all, notoriety can be quite attractive. She still flashes again on December 17th, 2010.

Then, on December 23rd, the cops arrive. Just what is going on? A pornography scandal? Child abuse? Amanda is questioned, and quite rapidly tells the story of a blackmailer/predator/stalker.

This was the start of so many lies. There was never a predator/older man/stalker or whatever. She simply made it up. Of course, they existed. In the Capper community, in which Amanda had become infamous, there are plenty of them. So Amanda knew that if she just pointed at someone to blame, she would sound credible. After all, you would trust a naive 14 year old pretty girl, wouldn’t you?

If you don’t believe me, fair enough. But ask yourselves some questions. If Amanda had been so stalked, why did she stay online for so long afterwards? Why did she have such a strong Facebook and YouTube presence if she thought there was some monster out there to get her? Why did she continue getting naked throughout 2011? Poor stalked girl – or narcissistic attention-seeker?

And how come this stalker was never caught? All the messaging that would have been going to and fro, all the spreading of the video by this ONE guy – there would have been a trail a mile wide. The police have had since December 23rd, 2010, to come up with something. But you know why they can’t? Because it’s not true.

So just get this straight. No predator, no stalker. Just lies.

PS: for some reason, WordPress didn’t show all of my first post. Perhaps now it makes more sense.

Just what did Amanda Todd do?

cutieelover2

This is not going well at all, if I’m honest. This blog has not gone the way I wanted it to, in many respects. As far as I know, only a very small percentage of viewers are concerned about what happened, and a few are simply vicious, wicked trouble-makers, out to bully people who come to this blog and make comments.

However, I shouldn’t be too dismayed. My hope with this blog was that it would turn into a dialogue – that has, to a certain extent, failed. I hoped that a few people might find help – a few people have. And, from my blog records, it looks like complaints about her video have been made – maybe something good will come from that. I haven’t particularly become a better person – depending on how tired or angry I get, I am prone to mischief-making and outbursts of aggression, which I feel guilty about later. I feel, sometimes, that I let down my more sensible readers, for which I apologise.

But it’s not all bad. The blog was also intended to be a sort of personal diary – a conversation with myself, setting down all the conflicts that were in my  head and trying to reach a conclusion. I wouldn’t really have been worried if no-one else read it. (The fact that now I get concerned about whether I get 100 views a day or 1000 is neither here nor there now. LOL)

So let’s continue with today’s information. Firstly, let me say again that I believe this to be true. Most of the fakers in the story are either too amateur, too obvious, or too stupid. If I or anyone else was trying to fake things, I would do a lot better job of it! I am a worrier, and it has gone through my mind that this is all part of an elaborate plot to make me look like a fool. Or it’s an even more elaborate plot to put me off the real story. But simply standing back and clearing my mind, all of this makes a lot more sense than the rest of the story. It’s easy to grab hold of information and make it fit, or present it in such a way that it fits an agenda. But my readers, I hope, can make up their own minds. So let me state once again – the information in yesterday’s post and in the following posts is true. Make of it what you will. So on with today’s screen cap. It is a continuation of the December 5th conversation, shown yesterday.

The first statement, I guess, may be from a hero in the room.  I could guess that the commenter is called ‘Spirit***’. But the comment is irrelevant.

From Dun***: ‘she bated on cam to ppl’.

Just in case, ‘bated’ is an abbreviation meaning ‘masturbated’. This is confusing. If it’s true, it shows that Amanda really was in it up to her neck. It also causes me concern, because I think it might be referring to the ‘black top’ pictures of Amanda, which I thought were from much later. But it could also be just a bit of mischief – ‘Dun***’ could just be trying to annoy, and make it look like he knows what is going on. However, Amanda doesn’t reply to deny it.

Amanda’s next comment as cutiielover: ‘and sent my boobs out to everyone in my city’ is a continuation of her previous statement that her friends found her pictures. So we have the scene: Amanda’s friends have found her pictures, and, of course, now half the town has seen them. The news would have spread like wildfire. But remember – the blackmailing story is dead in the water.

Many people online have said that it didn’t matter what Amanda did, it was all down to the blackmailer/stalker/predator. Now we know that this person never existed in the way she described. We are now beginning to see that maybe the rest of the story is false, too.

Dun*** continues his statement that Amanda bated with ‘other nite’ which would make sense. Kon***, in a world of his own, continues to talk to himself about why he likes sluts. Dun*** writes: ‘slut’. I don’t think this is the first time Amanda has heard that word but remember – it is possible that she doesn’t take this as an insult.

I believe I know who Zap*** is. There is a strong possibility that he is a double agent type – he comes into a room pretending to be nice and friendly, but might be a Capper. ‘Hey Cutie, whats up?’

Cra** writes: ‘oh daaamn’. This is his response to the revelation that Amanda’s friends have found her pictures. Dun*** continues with his annoyance: ‘still a slut’.

Jak*** asks: ‘are they still ur friend’ to which Amanda/cutiielover answers a firm ‘no’.

At this point, if everything ceased now, one would have to feel sorry for Amanda. She sounds like she is upset, and she knows she is possibly in deep trouble. But, as we know, she is back a few days later, still flashing.

Rumour time: there have been heavy hints that Amanda appeared in pictures smoking a joint. There is evidence to show that this is likely, but I have found only hearsay stuff. If she is in a state of mental confusion, smoking weed will have created a situation where her worries would have disappeared for a short while, and her inhibitions would have lost. There is a distinct possibility that Amanda, though fraught with worry and anticipation of the consequences, might well have been acting ‘under the influence’ later on. (Who says I don’t go out of my way to provide excuses?). However, there is also the possibility that later she might have thought ‘I’ve done it. I’m screwed. So what the heck.’

Whoever jak*** is makes quite a decent remark. These people aren’t completely devoid of sympathy. ‘gotta be careful who u trust’

Then the odd statement from Amanda: ‘iim moving out of the counrty now’. What can we read into this? Were there plans to move? Did people know already that she was in trouble, and had made plans to move? It doesn’t look like it. There is no record of a move to another country, though it’s a possibility that there were people Amanda could have lived with. But I think this is a red herring. The police didn’t arrive until December 23rd. I think that Amanda might be doing one of two things: being a drama queen, or trying to put people off her track.

‘come to america’…..’lol no’

Then cra*** says: ‘well you are super hot’. It’s a shame. Those words would have acted like a spur for Amanda. Whatever she’s feeling – sad, conflicted, scared – the compliment of being ‘super hot’ would have kept her in the game. If only at this point someone had said ‘Get away while you still can!’. It’s sad.

So what do we know for certain after this conversation?

We can forget the whole predator/pedophile/stalker malarkey as described by her and the media. It is a complete fallacy. The idea that she was capped when she was 12 and so on is complete and utter rubbish. Just what precisely happened, I will go into at a later date. Amanda would have encountered various people in her adventures, and some of those would not have been nice.

It is almost impossible to know who first spread her photos, but we now know it was done close to this date. Again, there are several possible scenarios. I will begin with the most likely:

Amanda went online and flashed and did whatever she did for fun. A Capper capped her actions, put it on to cameracaptures (possibly the video where she was accompanied) and sent a link to people – it went around in an instant.

or…..the person who accompanied Amanda blabbed – either through boasting or simple stupidity – and it went from there.

or….it is possible that Amanda herself bragged about it, actually being the first person to send a photo of herself out to a friend (the one who appeared with her) and that was a big mistake

Personally, I think it was a mixture. I think she was capped, but I also think she or her friend, or both, let the cat out of the bag amongst her friends. There have been allegations that she was boastful about what she did. We know she had plenty of enemies (girls who hated her at school) and they would have been looking for every opportunity to take revenge. Add into that mixing pot the actions of teen boys and their habit of passing round nudie pics of people they know, and the whole thing is set for disaster. A tsunami of sorrow.

The tale of an innocent flash is also destroyed. Kids are relatively tolerant of flashing – most of them have done it, and it’s seen as no big deal. OK, it might be a weapon to be used in school arguments, but not a great one. But what kids won’t tolerate is boastfulness and showing off, and there are limits as to what is seen to be acceptable behaviour online. Amanda would have crossed a line by displaying to large audiences, and by masturbating (or even simply showing genitalia).

I was astounded by the remarks passed around about Amanda. It looked like the kids were pitiless. But a lot of what they said – clumsily – was close to the truth. Amanda brought a lot of this on herself. She walked, or even ran, into the disaster zone. There can be no ‘she was naive’ nonsense any more – we can see that the warnings were clear. She knew very much what she was doing, and it is likely that she would have been aware of the consequences, but she was just too wrapped up in it.

Had she not lied so much in her video, it might have been a different story. People might have sympathised more with someone who told the truth. The video was a desperate attempt to clear her name, and it didn’t work. In fact, the video may have even been the cause of her downfall – her friends and allies would have had their tolerance tested just that once too often, and become tired of the constant attention seeking.

A sad tale. But not finished yet. Twelve days later, Amanda was back online flashing. There is a possibility that by this time she had attracted even more attention, and therefore from worse types of viewer. But we know that the photos were out there. Her friends had found them.

I am not 100% sure what happened next. It takes a lot of thought to put the pieces together. What I am trying to say is this: Amanda, at this point, was not being blackmailed. She was not coerced, forced, tricked, whatever. Her photos, as she says, were already all over the city. She MAY have encountered a stalker later on, but I strongly doubt it. She was aware of what went on in the Capper world. And when the police turned up on December 23rd, she was quick enough to try to turn it into a story of blackmailing. That is just not true. Everything she did around now, she did of her own free will.

Thank you for reading this. Please leave comments. The story will continue tomorrow – there are many loose ends now!

Amanda Todd – One step closer to the truth.

cutieelover1a

Sorry about the jpg. Just click on it.

As soon as one thing seems to get resolved, something else crops up that turns a lot of the story upside down again. There is a lot of grief in this – not just for the main participants, but for those other, more innocent victims of the witch hunts, the hatred, the suspicions. And for all those people from all across the world, all those genuine people, all those kids who have cried about this, it’s a terrible shame.

We have – and it saddens me to say this – been severely tricked.  I thought that  I would be jumping for joy as I learned that more and more of what I was saying was coming true, but instead I’m simply becoming more disheartened.

The details I have posted today are true. I will seek to evaluate them as clinically and as precisely as I possibly can. At first, I was just tempted to post the screen cap and leave it up to readers to make up their own minds. But, as usual, I will try to analyse what is behind all of this.

As you will see, the capture is from December 5th, 2010. That’s ten days after ‘cutieelover’ aka Amanda Todd joined BlogTV. What she did, or where she was prior to that, I don’t know at the moment. This is eighteen days before the police arrived on her doorstep on December 23rd.

Note that the BlogTV rules are absolutely clear. I have criticised BlogTV (now YouNow) for allowing things, but to give them credit, they were quite clear about the rules, and very quick to ban people who broke them. There is no real excuse for not knowing that nudity was frowned upon. As we know, cutiielover was banned twelve days later.

Amanda is quite well-known. It is possible that, from the commencement of her membership of BlogTV on November 26th, she could have received quite a following – reputations grow fast online.

Note: this may not be the full online conversation for December 5th. I originally thought that this might be the beginning of it all, but it is possible that there were earlier comments.

The first comment available is a cordial ‘sexy’. The second comment from cutieelover is – well, what? – poignant? Could that be the word? I don’t know. Or it could just be straightforward. Who can tell?

‘im not like that anymore’

What can anyone read into this? It sounds quite forlorn, like she’s realised something, and has decided to stop. On it’s own, it sounds like it’s a finality, but, sadly, we know that just a few days later she was flashing again, and that this behaviour continued on for quite some time. Can we deduce any period of time from this? Like I said – and I hope – her reputation might have simply grown in the previous two weeks, but I retain a slight idea that these are the words of someone who has been quite known for some time. But that is irrelevant, really.

It looks like one of her fans issues a ‘sigh’ of disappointment. Or of shared sadness?

I guess that the next comment is from someone new to the room: ‘what were u like’.  The answer is horrible.

‘a slut’

What in God’s name would make a girl say this? Here are some attempts to explain, but first let me say that it is significant and important. It points strongly towards why so many people used the word ‘slut’ to describe her – it’s the term she has applied to herself. It is actually Amanda herself who first uses the term to describe her own behaviour. People would have read these comments, and no doubt her friends would have heard her say it.

There are two reasons why she should have said this. The first is quite a cold-hearted suggestion; the second is gut-wrenchingly sad. I would prefer to choose the first. It kills me more to choose the second.

The first reason: Amanda is relatively proud of being seen as a slut. It’s a sort of show-off, attention-seeking phrase – ‘Look at me! I’m a slut! I’m not a mundane nobody, I’m someone who boys queue up to see! I’m the centre of attention, and that makes me feel important!’

Look at the news. We live in a society where sluttish behaviour makes you rich and famous. You know the names, I have no need to make a list. Reality TV praises the slut, denigrates the nice people. Look at the magazines aimed at later teens, read by 12-year-olds. In the UK, it’s ‘Nuts’ and ‘Zoo’. And those idiotic cretins who invented ‘slut walks’ – be proud that you look like a slut! Have they ANY idea what they are doing? (OK, reader, I’ll get down off my soap box)

Like so many words these days, slut has lost its meaning. It’s tossed around school playgrounds as easily as the old words like ‘fatty’ and ‘foureyes’. There is a distinct possibility that Amanda uses the term ‘slut’ as a badge of distinction.

The second reason: (this is appallingly sad) Amanda might have had such low self-esteem that she had become used to calling herself a slut. Why she would do this, I don’t know. From family background, I would guess the origin lay elsewhere. There are plenty of vile parents who will destroy their kids’ self-worth, but I don’t see that here. If anything, it might have been the opposite from her parents – they might have built her ego up to massive  proportions.

So why would she tag herself a slut? Did she go online, get naked, expect to get praise but get called a slut? Did she find that the only way to get the BlogTV viewers interested was to behave like a slut? It is extraordinary how dependent kids are on online feedback, and we know that Amanda was addicted to it.

Another, less probable but viable view is this: we know that Amanda possibly suffered from learning difficulties. She may well have had a huge sense that she was, in some way, a disappointment and failure. She had tried desperately to publicise herself online and elsewhere – singing, cheerleading – but it looks like the only thing she, as a person, felt that she truly excelled at, and that got her the attention, was to be a slut.

I must move on. The newbie answers a plaintive and shocked ‘oh’. Someone posts a picture.

‘lol….i kinda like sluts’ – seen as positive feedback?

The newbie asks her what made her change her mind.

‘idk why’ is Kon*** basically answering his own statement two lines above.

Another person enters the room.

Dun*** writes: ‘she is a slut she still is 1’. How is that meant? How is that taken? A joke? An insult? Horrifyingly aggressive male words? Or teen nonsense?

And then we have it:

‘all my friends found my pic’

Not ‘I’ve been stalked’. Not ‘I’ve been blackmailed’. All her friends found her pic. To me, this proves that the blackmail case is now closed. She said this to cover herself. There WAS a lot of stuff going on a la Peyton Ramsey, and it’s all very convoluted. But you can strike ‘blackmail’ and ‘stalker’ from the notebook for now.

I will leave it there for now. Tomorrow, there will be more about what really happened. It might take me time.

So – return to this blog – same Philip time, same Philip channel (that’s old skool Batman, just in case no-one knew).